If you're considering moving your Webflow site to another hosting provider, or need to deliver HTML files to a client, you've probably wondered: "Can I export my Webflow website?"
The short answer is yes—but there are significant limitations you need to understand first.
Webflow's greatest strength is its all-in-one platform that seamlessly integrates visual design, content management, hosting, form handling, and user interactions. This is why many consider Webflow a good platform choice in 2025 despite some limitations. This integrated ecosystem makes website building and management remarkably efficient.
When you export your Webflow site, you're effectively breaking this ecosystem apart. You'll maintain your design and visual elements, but lose all the dynamic features that make Webflow so powerful. This means you'll need to reconstruct each dynamic feature separately, often requiring multiple third-party services, custom code, or significant technical knowledge.
Most designers and agencies find that the convenience, reliability, and integrated workflows of Webflow hosting far outweigh any potential cost savings from self-hosting an exported site. However, there are valid reasons why you might need to export—from compliance requirements to client handoffs—which is why understanding the process is valuable.
In this guide, we'll examine exactly what happens when you export a Webflow site—what you keep, what you lose, and why it matters. We'll explore practical methods for exporting your Webflow site effectively, including both official and community-created tools.
We'll then dive into replacing each missing Webflow feature: content management, forms, search functionality, ecommerce, and membership systems. Finally, we'll provide implementation tips to help you decide whether exporting makes sense for your particular situation.
Whether you're considering export for a specific project or just exploring your options, this guide will give you a clear understanding of what's involved and help you make an informed decision.
When you export your Webflow site, you'll receive a neatly organized ZIP file containing:
Your site's visual design will remain identical—including responsive layouts, animations, and interactive elements. This is because Webflow's interactions are client-side (running in the user's browser), so they continue to function as long as the webflow.js file is included.
For example, if you've created complex animations, hover states, or scroll-based effects, these will all work perfectly on your exported site. The same applies to navigation menus, accordions, tabs, and other interactive UI components that Webflow provides.
Despite preserving your design, the export process strips away all server-side and dynamic functionality:
These limitations aren't minor inconveniences—they represent core functionality that you'll need to rebuild from scratch if they're essential to your site. For instance, if your site relies heavily on CMS-driven content (like a blog or portfolio), you'll face the significant challenge of implementing a new content management system and migrating all your data.
The standard way to export your site is directly through Webflow:
This method gives you clean, well-organized code that's ready to be hosted anywhere. However, as mentioned earlier, you only get the static elements of your site—no CMS content, form handling, or other dynamic features.
A popular community approach for preserving CMS content involves using web scraping tools:
Wget (for Mac/Linux), HTTrack (for Windows), or SiteSucker (for Mac) can crawl your published Webflow site and save every page as static HTML, including those generated from your CMS collections. This creates a complete snapshot of your site as it currently exists.
The process typically involves:
The advantage is that you capture all current content, including CMS-generated pages that the official export omits. However, these remain static snapshots—you can't update them without repeating the scraping process.
Udesly offers a more sophisticated solution for maintaining dynamic content after export. This paid service converts your Webflow export into various formats:
The conversion process preserves your design while enabling ongoing content management through the target platform. However, you'll need to re-export and re-convert whenever you make design changes in Webflow, which can create workflow challenges for sites that change frequently.
ExFlow is a community-built tool specifically designed to help with the CMS limitation of Webflow exports. Unlike the official export, ExFlow attempts to capture all your CMS-generated pages as static HTML files.
The service works by:
ExFlow offers both free and paid tiers (starting at $5.99/month for Standard and $15.99/month for Professional), with the paid options providing additional features like Git integration, custom scripts, and automatic site hosting. This can be a good middle-ground solution if you need a simple way to export CMS content without setting up scraping tools yourself.
For teams with development resources, more advanced options exist:
These approaches require significant technical knowledge but offer the most flexibility. For instance, a development team might keep content editors working in the familiar Webflow CMS while deploying the site through a custom CI/CD pipeline to specialized hosting.
Before diving into ways to replace Webflow's features, it's important to understand that some approaches may conflict with Webflow's Terms of Service or recommended best practices. Specifically:
While many developers and agencies use these techniques without issue, you should proceed with caution and ideally consult with Webflow support or review their current Terms of Service before implementing any solution that seems to work around Webflow's intended workflows.
Additionally, remember that implementing these alternative solutions often creates technical debt and maintenance challenges that may outweigh the benefits of exporting in the first place.
When you export your Webflow site, you'll need a new way to manage dynamic content. Here are your main options:
Headless CMS platforms:
Static site CMS options:
The implementation process typically involves:
Remember that any CMS replacement will require a different content editing workflow than what you had in Webflow—usually with less visual editing capability and a steeper learning curve for non-technical editors.
Form functionality can be restored using third-party services that specialize in form handling:
Popular form solutions:
Implementation typically requires:
For example, if using Netlify Forms, you would add the attribute data-netlify="true" to your form element and potentially add a success page URL. Formspree requires pointing your form action to a unique endpoint they provide.
The good news is that your form's visual design and field validation will typically remain intact—you're just changing where the data gets sent when someone submits the form.
Replacing Webflow's site search requires implementing a third-party search solution:
Algolia offers a powerful search API that can be integrated into static sites. The process involves:
Google Programmable Search Engine provides a simpler alternative:
For smaller sites, client-side search libraries like Lunr.js or Fuse.js can index a JSON file of your content and search it directly in the browser—no external service required, but limited to smaller content sets.
If your Webflow site includes ecommerce functionality, you'll need to rebuild it using external services:
Foxy.io (formerly FoxyCart) is popular among Webflow exporters because it:
Snipcart offers another well-regarded solution that:
Shopify Buy Button can be a good option if you're already familiar with Shopify. It embeds buyable products into any website while leveraging Shopify's robust backend.
Implementation typically involves adding the service's JavaScript to your site and marking up product elements with specific data attributes that tell the cart system what's being purchased.
For sites requiring user accounts or gated content, these services can replace Webflow's membership functionality:
Memberstack is designed specifically with Webflow in mind and:
Outseta provides a more comprehensive solution that includes:
Both services work by adding JavaScript to your site that controls content visibility based on user login state. Implementation involves:
Note that these front-end solutions don't provide the same level of security as server-side authentication—determined users could potentially find hidden content in your HTML. For truly sensitive information, you'd need a more robust server-side solution.
Exporting your Webflow site gives you complete control over your hosting environment, but at the cost of significant functionality. You'll keep your design, layout, and client-side interactions, but lose all dynamic features that rely on Webflow's servers.
Replacing these features requires implementing various third-party services or custom solutions. While entirely possible, this process introduces complexity, ongoing maintenance requirements, and potentially higher costs spread across multiple platforms.
Exporting makes sense if you:
Staying on Webflow hosting is better if you:
For most users—especially those leveraging Webflow's Designer, Webflow Editor, and he dynamic features of Webflow CMS—the convenience and integrated workflow of Webflow hosting far outweighs the potential benefits of exporting. The time and resources required to rebuild and maintain these features elsewhere often exceed any cost savings from alternative hosting.
If you need help evaluating whether exporting is right for your project, or assistance implementing a smooth transition to self-hosting, our agency can provide expert guidance tailored to your specific requirements.
After exporting code from Webflow, several key dynamic features stop functioning because they rely on Webflow's servers. The CMS functionality breaks completely—collection lists appear empty, and no collection item pages are generated. Forms won't submit data anywhere, as they require Webflow's backend processing.
Site search functionality stops working since it depends on Webflow's content indexing. Any ecommerce components (product listings, carts, checkout) become non-functional shells.
The Webflow Editor interface becomes inaccessible, meaning content can't be updated through Webflow's visual interface. Password-protected pages lose their protection. 301 redirects configured in Webflow no longer function. Automatically generated sitemaps and RSS feeds are not included.
In essence, anything requiring server-side processing or database access is lost, leaving you with just the static front-end of your site. For each missing feature, you'll need to implement an alternative solution if it's essential to your site.
Adding a CMS to exported Webflow code requires implementing an alternative content management system since Webflow's native CMS functionality doesn't export. The most straightforward approach is using a static site generator with a headless CMS.
For a no-code solution, the Udesly Adapter can convert your Webflow export into a Jamstack site with Netlify CMS integration. After conversion, you'll have a fully functional static site where content editors can update material through Netlify CMS's admin interface.
For more flexibility, export your Webflow CMS content as CSV and implement a headless CMS like Contentful, Sanity, or Strapi. You'll need to modify your HTML templates to pull content from the headless CMS using their JavaScript SDKs or APIs.
Developer teams often create custom solutions using static site generators like Eleventy, Hugo, or Next.js, connecting them to headless CMSs for content editing while maintaining Webflow's design.
The process involves technical work but results in a site that preserves both Webflow's design flexibility and content management capabilities when self-hosted.
To restore form functionality in exported Webflow code, you'll need to implement a third-party form handling service. First, identify the forms in your exported HTML and locate the <form> elements.
Choose a form service like Formspree, Basin, or Netlify Forms based on your needs and budget. For Formspree (which offers a simple solution), create an account and get your unique form endpoint. Edit each form's HTML to add this endpoint as the form's action attribute: <form action="https://formspree.io/f/yourformid" method="POST">.
For Netlify Forms (if hosting on Netlify), simply add the attribute data-netlify="true" to your form tag and ensure form names are unique. You may need to disable Webflow's form handling JavaScript by adding onsubmit="return true" to the form tag or removing relevant scripts.
Don’t forget to test your Webflow form submissions thoroughly after implementation. For advanced features like conditional logic or file uploads, services like Jotform might be more appropriate.
Converting a Webflow export to a WordPress theme is most efficiently done using the Udesly Adapter tool. This specialized service transforms your Webflow design into a fully functional WordPress theme while preserving your visual design and converting dynamic elements.
The process involves:
The adapter handles the complex conversion of Webflow's class-based styling to WordPress theme structure and creates template files that maintain your responsive design. It even translates Webflow CMS fields to WordPress custom fields.
For developers comfortable with WordPress theme development, an alternative is to manually convert the export by creating WordPress template files (header.php, footer.php, single.php, etc.) and incorporating Webflow's HTML/CSS structure within them. This approach requires significant WordPress development knowledge but offers more customization control.
Yes, Webflow interactions work perfectly after code export as long as you include all necessary files. The webflow.js file included in your export package contains all the code needed to execute animations and interactions created in Webflow's Designer. This includes scroll animations, hover effects, click triggers, and complex multi-state interactions.
Webflow doesn't provide a native option to export only specific pages. When you use the export feature, it generates a complete package containing all pages, styles, scripts, and assets in your project. This all-or-nothing approach ensures proper functioning of shared components and stylesheets.
However, you can achieve selective exporting through manual methods after the fact. After exporting the full site, you can delete unwanted HTML files and their associated assets, keeping only the pages you need. This approach requires careful handling to avoid breaking dependencies—ensure you retain all CSS, JavaScript, and images referenced by your kept pages.
For a more precise approach, some developers use tools like Wget with specific page filters to download only certain pages from the published site. This can be more accurate for preserving exactly what you need.
Yes, you can edit exported Webflow code manually, but there are important considerations to ensure successful modifications. The exported code is standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it fully editable in any code editor like VS Code, Sublime Text, or even simple text editors.
When editing, maintain the file structure to preserve dependencies. The CSS is organized into several files (normalize.css, webflow.css, and your project-specific CSS), so understand which file controls which aspects of your design before making changes.
Choosing Webflow or Framer for 2025? Compare design, CMS, speed, learning curve & cost in our clear guide.
Webflow vs Wix? Compare Webflow’s design flexibility vs Wix’s ease-of-use to match your project’s needs.
Webflow or HubSpot in 2025? Compare design, SEO, performance, ease-of-use & pricing to find your ideal platform.