The web development landscape continues to evolve rapidly, and platforms like Webflow have dramatically transformed how websites are built. As we move through 2025, many businesses and designers are asking: Is Webflow still a good choice?
The short answer is yes—for the right use cases, Webflow remains an excellent platform.
However, the longer answer requires understanding Webflow's position in the current market, its strengths and limitations, and how it compares to emerging competitors.
Webflow has undergone significant transformation since its early days as a visual web design tool. What began as a way to visually create custom websites without code has evolved into what Webflow now calls a comprehensive "Website Experience Platform" (WXP). This strategic repositioning goes far beyond simple site building—it encompasses the entire lifecycle of website management, allowing teams to not only build sites but also analyze visitor behavior, conduct A/B testing, personalize content, and optimize performance all within one unified platform.
This evolution was accelerated through strategic acquisitions. In April 2024, Webflow acquired Intellimize (an AI-driven personalization platform) and this move, alongside launching Webflow Analyze and Optimize, showcase Webflow's expansion from design tools into marketing technology—all supporting their vision of a unified, visual-first platform where marketing teams can work without code dependencies.
Webflow has been remarkably active in releasing new features over the past year. Here are some of the most significant updates in chronological order:
These updates demonstrate Webflow's commitment to evolving beyond simple site building toward a comprehensive platform for the entire website lifecycle.
Webflow has solidified its role as a leader in the no-code movement, particularly for visual web development. The platform has gained traction with professional design agencies, marketing teams, and even enterprise clients. Major companies like IDEO, Monday.com, TED, The New York Times, Philips, and Discord now use Webflow for various web projects.
The shift toward serving enterprise clients is evident in Webflow's Enterprise offerings, which include features like SSO integration, custom SLAs, audit logs, and custom roles. Yet, Webflow has maintained strong relationships with its core user base of freelancers and agencies through dedicated Freelancer and Agency workspace plans with features like white-labeling and client billing.
Webflow has continued to evolve its strengths in 2025, establishing itself as a leader in several key areas that make it an attractive platform for specific website needs.
Webflow continues to excel at enabling high-quality, visually distinctive websites. In 2025, the platform is frequently used to build award-winning sites with rich interactions and animations. The acquisition of GreenSock (makers of the GSAP animation library) in 2024 has further strengthened Webflow's animation capabilities, and the upcoming Interactions 3.0 release is expected in the near future.
For designers seeking pixel-perfect implementation without coding, Webflow remains unmatched. The Designer allows granular control over every aspect of a website's appearance while generating clean, semantic code under the hood.
Webflow's CMS has matured into a powerful system for marketing websites. The ability to define custom content types visually makes it accessible to non-developers, while recent improvements like individual CMS item publishing and draft modes have streamlined editorial workflows.
For marketing teams, Webflow offers an ideal balance: developers and designers can build templates and design systems, while content creators can safely update the site without breaking layouts. This collaboration-friendly approach is a major selling point for organizations with mixed technical and marketing teams.
Webflow sites benefit from the platform's robust hosting infrastructure. All sites are served via a global CDN with static file publishing, resulting in fast loading times. Internal testing shows that Webflow pages often load faster than equivalent sites on other platforms, partly due to eliminating server processing delays.
Security is another strength—Webflow's closed architecture means there's no risk of plugin vulnerabilities, and the platform automatically handles SSL, backups, and other security measures. For teams without dedicated IT resources, this "set it and forget it" approach to security is invaluable.
Webflow occupies an interesting middle ground in the ease-of-use spectrum. While it's not the simplest website builder available (that title might go to Framer), it offers significantly more power and flexibility than most no-code tools while remaining more accessible than traditional coding.
This balance has made Webflow particularly popular among professionals who understand web fundamentals but want to work visually. In 2025, Webflow's educational resources like Webflow University continue to be excellent, helping new users climb the learning curve.
Despite its strengths, Webflow isn't perfect for every project. Understanding its limitations is crucial for making informed decisions.
Webflow has made strategic decisions about what it doesn't want to be. In late 2024, the company announced it would deprecate its native Logic and User Accounts features in favor of integrating with third-party solutions. This signals a "ecosystem-first approach" where Webflow focuses on core competencies while relying on partners for specialized functionality.
While this focus helps Webflow excel in its core areas, it means the platform isn't ideal for complex web applications requiring sophisticated backend logic or user authentication. For such projects, alternatives like custom development or platforms like Bubble may be more appropriate.
Webflow's Ecommerce capabilities, while functional for basic stores, haven't seen substantial development since their introduction. Community sentiment suggests Webflow has essentially "abandoned" major e-commerce upgrades to focus on its strengths elsewhere.
For small catalogs or simple stores, Webflow Ecommerce works well. However, businesses with more complex selling needs (subscription products, complex discounts, large inventories) will likely find Webflow's offerings insufficient compared to dedicated platforms like Shopify or WooCommerce (recently rebranded to Woo).
Webflow's pricing has evolved significantly between 2023 and 2025, generally becoming more complex and enterprise-oriented. Recent changes include seat-based pricing for team members and reduced bandwidth allowances on some plans.
These pricing shifts have received mixed reactions from the community. While they offer more flexibility for certain team configurations (like content editors at lower rates), some freelancers and small agencies feel squeezed by the changes. The introduction of bandwidth add-ons and auto-upgrades suggests Webflow is focusing on monetizing growth, which is reasonable from a business perspective but can lead to unexpected costs for users.
For high-traffic sites, Webflow's bandwidth limitations and the jump to Enterprise pricing can be particularly challenging. Once you exceed the already expensive ~2,500GB/month bandwidth limit on the highest self-serve plan (costing $999/month), costs can increase dramatically with Enterprise plans potentially costing tens of thousands annually—far more than equivalent hosting on platforms like WordPress.
Understanding how Webflow compares to alternatives like Framer and WordPress in 2025 can help you choose the right platform for your specific project needs and team capabilities.
Framer has emerged as a compelling alternative to Webflow, particularly for designers seeking an even more intuitive interface. Framer's design-centric approach feels closer to tools like Figma, making it easier for pure designers to pick up quickly.
However, Framer's CMS capabilities remain more limited than Webflow's, and its ecosystem of integrations is smaller (about 100 plugins compared to Webflow's ~250 apps). For simple sites with strong visual focus, Framer can be excellent, but Webflow still offers more depth for content-rich or complex projects.
Pricing is another differentiator—Framer generally costs less for comparable usage at the lower end of the spectrum, making it attractive for smaller projects.
WordPress remains the dominant CMS globally, powering approximately 62% of CMS-based websites. Its massive plugin ecosystem (~59,000 free plugins) provides unmatched extensibility, and its open-source nature allows unlimited customization.
The key trade-off between WordPress and Webflow in 2025 remains largely unchanged: WordPress offers greater flexibility and lower potential costs but requires more technical maintenance and security vigilance. Webflow provides a more streamlined, secure experience with excellent design tools but with platform limitations and potentially higher costs at scale.
For organizations with technical resources that need extensive integrations or very high traffic at reasonable cost, WordPress often makes more sense. For teams prioritizing design quality and maintenance-free operation, Webflow continues to be compelling.
Based on Webflow's current state, it excels for these use cases:
Webflow may not be the best fit for:
Yes, Webflow remains an excellent platform in 2025—for the right projects.
It has matured into a powerful Website Experience Platform that handles the entire lifecycle of content-focused, design-rich websites. The continuous improvements to its core design and CMS capabilities, plus the addition of analytics and optimization tools, demonstrate Webflow's commitment to evolving with the industry.
However, Webflow has also become more focused on what it does best, rather than trying to be all things to all users. This sharpened focus means it excels at certain tasks while deliberately staying away from others. The platform's pricing evolution also signals a move toward professional and enterprise users, potentially leaving some smaller users feeling pressure.
For marketing websites, content sites, and visually distinctive web projects where design quality and editor experience are priorities, Webflow continues to be among the best options available. Its visual approach strikes a compelling balance between power and accessibility that few competitors match.
Ultimately, the key to success with Webflow is understanding its strengths and limitations, then choosing it for projects that align with what it does best. As with any platform, it's about finding the right tool for your specific needs.
For a comprehensive technical comparison between Webflow and alternatives like WordPress and Framer, including performance benchmarks, feature breakdowns, and detailed pricing analysis, check out our in-depth platform comparison.
Confused about which domain format to use on your Webflow site? Learn the pros and cons of each approach and get clear recommendations.
Webflow templates don't update automatically like WordPress themes. Our guide explains why, how to manage template-based sites.
Need each collection page to display different third-party content? Learn how to overcome Webflow's standard embed constraints.